One of the oldest cliches in professional sports is that
Offense puts people in the seats, but Defense wins championships. With the NBA playoffs in full swing now, its
as good a time as ever to examine how true it is for the league. To see just what effect both play, we’ll
start by looking at which teams make the playoffs versus those that don’t.
From 2004-2012, the league average efficiency on both sides
of the court averaged right around 107 points per 100 possessions. The average that a team needed to hit
offensively to be amongst contenders was 108.2, while teams that failed to
qualify averaged in at 104.8. These
numbers are pretty close to their defensive counterparts (109 for non playoff
teams, 104.6 for playoff qualifiers).
The below chart gives a pretty good overview of how league scoring has
trended, with a rise until the 2008 season followed by a pretty sharp drop off
We do see the old cliché holding, with team’s that made the
playoffs sporting a better than league average defensive rating at a
statistically significant level. We also
though see these same teams holding a significant offensive edge over their
less competitive peers. To advance in
the playoffs though, does it take being a grittier defensive team?
The data says not particularly moreso than being a good
offense. Teams that advanced through the
first round typically shared again the fact that they were superior to their
opponents in both phases of the game.
During the studied period, the typical teams meeting in the championship
also did not display a real difference between their offensive or defensive
capabilities. Both held well above league average offenses and defenses though.
So, it would seem that the mantra has some weight, as teams
that were better than league average were more likely to make the
playoffs. However, they were not so much
more likely than the teams that played superior offense to do so.


No comments:
Post a Comment